Copyright fails the taste test

This week the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) handed down its judgment in the case of Levola Hengelo BV v Smilde Foods BV which asserted that the taste of food does not attract protection as a copyright work.


Levola – the maker of Dutch cream cheese “Heksenkaas” which is a popular spreadable dip made with cream cheese and herbs – has been creating and selling its product since 2007. In 2014, Smilde, began selling a similar product called “Witte Wievenkaas” to a supermarket chain in the Netherlands.

Levola raised a claim against Smilde claiming that the production and sale of “Witte Wivenkaas” infringed its copyright in the taste of Heksenkaas. However, Smilde argued that a taste in itself cannot be protected by copyright.

The case was originally dismissed by a Dutch tribunal on the grounds that the taste of “Heksenkaas” “lacked originality and personal character.” Levola chose to appeal the decision to the European Courts, with the Attorney General and CJEU being asked to consider whether the taste of a food product can be protected under the EU Copyright Directive (Directive 2001/29/EC).

CJEU Decision

In its assertation that the taste of food is not a protectable copyright work, the CJEU considered the definition of ‘work’ within the meaning of the Copyright Directive.

  1. Under the Copyright Directive the classification of something as a ‘work’ requires two important elements:
    the subject matter must be “an original intellectual creation;” and
  2. it must be considered an “expression” of that original intellectual creation.

Considering this in line with the Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights and the WIPO Copyright Treaty, the CJEU commented that protection is granted to expressions and not to ideas, a work therefore must be expressed in a way which makes it “identifiable with sufficient precision and objectivity, even though that expression is not necessarily in permanent form.”

The CJEU commented that when you consider a literary work or musical work you are able to determine the precise and object expression of that work. In contrast, the taste of a food product can be “subjective or variable” depending on a variety of factors. For example, a person’s age, food preferences or even the environment in which a product is consumed can alter the way that we taste.

The CJEU therefore found that as you cannot pin down a taste with any “precision or objectivity,” the taste of a product cannot be classified as a “work” and as a result cannot benefit from copyright protection under the Copyright Directive.

Attorney General

This decision follows the line of reasoning presented by the Advocate General who considered that the Copyright Directive only currently covers “works” that can either be perceived either visually or audibly and does not account for any other senses (i.e. taste or smell).


Considering the CJEU’s reasoning, this does seem a sensible decision. If we cannot clearly identify the subject matter that we want to protect using copyright, how could you identify that it had been infringed?

However, Playdough were recently successful in establishing a trade mark in relation to its smell.

This article was co-written by Jennifer Dool.

Latest updates from @MacRoberts

  • Our award-winning Family Law team can help you and your partner through difficult situations by providing support w… 23 hours ago
  • To celebrate the Olympic Games in Tokyo, we're delighted to launch our latest sporting challenge in support of our… 23/07/2021
  • MacRoberts is recruiting! We are currently looking for a Real Estate Planning Solicitor to join the MacRoberts tea… 23/07/2021
  • The countdown is on! With just 100 days to go, we’re looking forward to #COP26 in Glasgow! ♻️ As a firm accredite… 22/07/2021
  • Has lockdown led you to consider a move to the countryside? From discussing a possible purchase to obtaining the… 22/07/2021
  • Have you seen our latest vacancies? 💼 We currently have opportunities in various departments across the firm. Fin… 21/07/2021
  • Acas has published new guidance for employers with helpful information on #flexibleworking & #hybridworking. With t… 20/07/2021
  • Busting the myth that a career in law is only for the privileged few: @marikaflawyer is speaking at this morning’s… 19/07/2021
  • MacRoberts is recruiting! We are currently looking for a Support Services Assistant to join our team in Edinburgh.… 16/07/2021
  • MacRoberts is pleased to have been part of the team advising @HV_Systems in its £5m capital boost from Beehive Equi… 15/07/2021
  • MacRoberts is recruiting! We are currently looking for a NQ Solicitor to join our Conveyancing & Private Client te… 14/07/2021
  • For the last of our IGTV mini-series, we hear from Katie MacLeod. She will be giving an insight into what it’s like… 14/07/2021
  • RT @marikaflawyer: Exciting opportunity for Associate in our award winning Family Law team #familylaw #LegalCareer 14/07/2021
  • MacRoberts is recruiting! We are currently looking for an Associate to join our Family Law team in Edinburgh or Gl… 14/07/2021
  • Last week, the UK Government took the decision to relax the rules on the length of time lorry drivers can work as a… 13/07/2021