Too good for its own good? Google fined record £3.8bn for abusing dominant position

We all know that Google has been one of the great US technology company success stories. However, in the last few years the EU Commission has been scrutinising these large (mainly US based) technology giants for potential abuses of their dominant position. On 18th July, the EU Commission concluded one such investigation into Google and handed down a record fine of £3.8bn (€4.34bn) for Google’s abuse of its dominant position in relation to the Android operating system.

What is a dominant position?

This is set out in what is known as the Chapter II prohibition (governed by Article 102 of the TFEU), which under UK law is set out in The Competition Act 1998.

This states that “any abuse by one or more undertakings of a dominant position within the common market or in a substantial part of it shall be prohibited as incompatible with the common market in so far as it may affect trade between Member States.”

A dominant market position can vary depending on the market in question. Sometimes having 30% market share could be deemed “dominant” if all other competitors in that market only have 5-10% market share each and therefore you effectively can control the market and make decisions that benefit your organisation, at times to the detriment of the other market players.

In Google’s case, its dominance is very easy to determine – Google’s Android operating system is the most popular mobile operating system in the world (it is used by over 75% of all smartphones!). Google’s search engine (Google Search) is also the most popular search engine – with over 95% of all searches conducted via the Google search engine.

How did Google abuse its dominant position?

The EU Commission has previously fined Google £2.2bn for using the Google search engine to give its Google Shopping platform an unfair (and illegal) advantage during searches.

As previously discussed, this investigation into the Android platform is also accompanied by another investigation into Google AdSense platform, so we may soon see the Commission levying another record fine on Google before the year is out!

Google has been fined in relation to its activities around the promotion of its Android platform. When phone companies such as Samsung want to install the Android platform on to their phones, Google offered these companies financial incentives to pre-install its Android/Google applications which prohibit devices from using other operating systems.

As well as this, Google Search is the default search engine on most Android devices sold in Europe. The Commission has held that Google’s actions have created barriers to entry for other market entrants/participants and that this equates to an abuse of their dominant market position.

What happens next?

Along with its previous £2.2bn fine for the Google Shopping investigation, Google now has another £3.8bn fine to contend with. Along with these fines, the conduct must cease within 90 days or Google will face penalty payments of up to 5% of the average daily worldwide turnover of Google (this could add up to tens or even hundreds of billions of pounds!)

Google also awaits the outcome of the Commission’s final ongoing investigation into its AdSense platform which could land them with another record fine, going by the precedent set by Margrethe Vestager and her team, who have gained a reputation worldwide for tackling these global technology giants.

This article was co-written by Rebecca Henderson.

Latest updates from @MacRoberts

  • Would you like to work at one of Scotland’s leading law firms? We currently have a number of opportunities availabl… 21/06/2021
  • We currently have a vacancy for a Customer Due Diligence Administrator based in Glasgow or Edinburgh. Please shar… 18/06/2021
  • Maya Forstater received a lot of media attention around her tweets relating to her beliefs about sex, resulting in… 18/06/2021
  • Applications for our traineeships starting in 2023 are now open! Get your legal career off to the best possible sta… 18/06/2021
  • RT @DundeeAndAngus: Leading Scottish commercial law firm, @MacRoberts has advised BAM on the ‘game-changing’ Atlantic Square development in… 16/06/2021
  • This week on our new IGTV mini-series, giving an insight into what it’s like to begin a legal career during the pan… 16/06/2021
  • Self-employed status: What does the Uber case really mean? 🚖 Kenny Scott explains what the recent ruling means for… 16/06/2021
  • What is the Scottish #gin industry doing to improve #sustainability? Following #WorldGinDay celebrations over the w… 15/06/2021
  • The European Commission has adopted & published versions of two new sets of Standard Contractual Clauses. What ch… 15/06/2021
  • What impact could Ireland High Court's decision to reject an action by Facebook to block an inquiry by the Irish… 14/06/2021
  • Wishing all of our followers a happy #WorldGinDay! ICYMI: Earlier this week, we were delighted to catch up with… 12/06/2021
  • We're #hiring! We have a #vacancy for a Senior #Solicitor or Associate to join our IP, Technology & Commercial team… 10/06/2021
  • Dealing with an employee's misconduct when that employee contends it is linked to a disability can be tricky - read… 09/06/2021
  • MacRoberts' have launched a new IGTV mini-series, giving an insight into what it’s like to begin a legal career dur… 09/06/2021
  • Scotland's new #landownership transparency register - the Register of Persons Holding a Controlled Interest in Land… 09/06/2021