'I do' or 'No thank you' - the end of civil partnerships?

It has been five years since the Marriage and Civil Partnerships (Scotland) Act 2014 was passed, so the question is - what, if anything, has changed?

On 12 March 2014, the Marriage and Civil Partnership (Scotland) Act was brought into force, 10 years after the Civil Partnership Act 2004 allowed same sex couples to formalise their relationships for the first time. It sought to eliminate the perceived secondary status of civil partnerships and ensure that these relationships could also be classed as marriages. It clarified who may solemnise same sex marriage and the procedure and place where the marriage may take place. The question we ask ourselves is, with the introduction of same sex marriages, is there still a need for civil partnerships in Scotland?

Pre Marriage and Civil Partnerships (Scotland) Act

The Civil Partnership Act 2004, which came into force in 2005, made provision for same sex couples to form a civil partnership in Scotland. It afforded couples of the same sex similar rights and responsibilities to that of a married couple. These rights included parental responsibility and next of kin rights. For example, civil partners were given the right to acquire parental rights as a step parent and could also apply for residence and contact orders. Further, the right to apply for financial provision for children was also extended to civil partners - legal protections which had, to that point, only been afforded to married couples. A distinction remained, however, in terms of the terminology used and the types of ceremonies and locations that same-sex couples could avail of when celebrating their love and commitment to one another.

The legislation was a celebrated step forward for LGBT rights in Scotland and saw an immediate surge in civil partnerships taking place. Statistics taken from the National Register of Scotland show that in 2006, the year after the Civil Partnerships Act came into effect, 1,047 civil partnerships were entered into in Scotland. 

Statistics remained relatively consistent over a period of 9 years, the numbers recorded never dropping below 430 civil partnerships per year. During the intervening ten years, LGBT activists continued to press for real marriage equality, resulting in the Marriage and Civil Partnership Act bringing about the long desired opportunity for same sex marriage in Scotland.

Post Marriage and Civil Partnerships (Scotland) Act 2014

According to the statistics of the National Register of Scotland, there was a dramatic decline in civil partnerships in Scotland from 2015, the date the new legislation was passed. 2015 recorded an all-time low of 64 civil partnerships registered in Scotland while there had been 70 civil partnerships in 2016 and 2017. So we ask ourselves, was the undeniable decline a result of same sex couples awaiting the new legislation which would afford them the opportunity of marriage opting for this over civil partnership? If so, do we really need civil partnerships in Scotland?

According to statistics taken from the National Register of Scotland, there were 1,671 same sex marriages that took place in Scotland in 2015. Of these marriages, 935 were conversions from existing civil partnerships and 736 were new marriages. In 2016, 998 same sex marriages were recorded and the numbers remained consistent throughout 2017 which recorded 982 same sex marriages. Evidently, the statistics show marriage was on the rise and civil partnerships were a thing of the past for many same sex couples, many having opted to convert their civil partnership into a marriage. It is clear from this that, given the number of civil partnerships converted to marriage, the relevance of the concept of marriage went far beyond the legal rights of same sex couples.

The future of civil partnerships in Scotland

Although introduced to afford civil rights to the LGBT community, recent Supreme Court litigation considered whether the human rights of heterosexual couples were infringed as they were not permitted to enter into a civil partnership, only marriage. While the landmark ruling in R (on the application of Steinfeld and Keidan) v Secretary of State for International Development (in substitution for the Home Secretary and the Education Secretary) was relative to civil partnership legislation in England and Wales, the effect on the Scottish counterpart will also be felt. In this case, the UK Supreme Court held that, as the law currently stands, the UK is in breach of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) on the grounds of equality because it does not allow opposite-sex couples to enter civil partnerships. The case was the catalyst to the Scottish Government consulting on and seeking the views of the public on civil partnership, asking whether future civil partnerships should be banned or whether civil partnerships should be afforded to couples of the opposite sex. The argument is that civil partnerships are only available to couples of the same sex, whereas, since the Marriage and Civil Partnership Bill was passed, marriage is open to everyone. It is the Government’s intention to review this matter before deciding on the future of civil partnerships on Scotland.

The consultation came to an end in December 2018 - therefore, watch this space…

This article was co-written by Liusa Reid.

 

Source: National Register of Scotland

Latest updates from @MacRoberts

  • Would you like to work at one of Scotland’s leading law firms? We currently have a number of opportunities availabl… https://t.co/atxn5NHzLj 21/06/2021
  • We currently have a vacancy for a Customer Due Diligence Administrator based in Glasgow or Edinburgh. Please shar… https://t.co/IXsvMkBnYa 18/06/2021
  • Maya Forstater received a lot of media attention around her tweets relating to her beliefs about sex, resulting in… https://t.co/VbDAGhzAqX 18/06/2021
  • Applications for our traineeships starting in 2023 are now open! Get your legal career off to the best possible sta… https://t.co/nx3WmygTTM 18/06/2021
  • RT @DundeeAndAngus: Leading Scottish commercial law firm, @MacRoberts has advised BAM on the ‘game-changing’ Atlantic Square development in… 16/06/2021
  • This week on our new IGTV mini-series, giving an insight into what it’s like to begin a legal career during the pan… https://t.co/tqSQy4tRqG 16/06/2021
  • Self-employed status: What does the Uber case really mean? 🚖 Kenny Scott explains what the recent ruling means for… https://t.co/SIt6iBNYPx 16/06/2021
  • What is the Scottish #gin industry doing to improve #sustainability? Following #WorldGinDay celebrations over the w… https://t.co/P4d0oPh54U 15/06/2021
  • The European Commission has adopted & published versions of two new sets of Standard Contractual Clauses. What ch… https://t.co/c8nMQEo6uk 15/06/2021
  • What impact could Ireland High Court's decision to reject an action by Facebook to block an inquiry by the Irish… https://t.co/leiseQnxYe 14/06/2021
  • Wishing all of our followers a happy #WorldGinDay! ICYMI: Earlier this week, we were delighted to catch up with… https://t.co/OJ85qOwAhN 12/06/2021
  • We're #hiring! We have a #vacancy for a Senior #Solicitor or Associate to join our IP, Technology & Commercial team… https://t.co/YWbpcD0eFD 10/06/2021
  • Dealing with an employee's misconduct when that employee contends it is linked to a disability can be tricky - read… https://t.co/Gy1dLbrwPk 09/06/2021
  • MacRoberts' have launched a new IGTV mini-series, giving an insight into what it’s like to begin a legal career dur… https://t.co/yJ5RQRatPn 09/06/2021
  • Scotland's new #landownership transparency register - the Register of Persons Holding a Controlled Interest in Land… https://t.co/PrZ5AwH2Ej 09/06/2021