UK Supreme Court judgment in FCA business interruption test case

This article is a follow-up to our previous discussion on the case.

On 15 January 2021, the UK Supreme Court handed down its much-anticipated, final judgment in the COVID-19 Business Interruption insurance test case of The Financial Conduct Authority v Arch and Others.

The Supreme Court unanimously dismissed the Insurer’s appeals, with the lead judgment given by Lord Hamblen and Lord Leggatt. After seven months of debate, this decision brings not only definitive guidance and clarity, but also positive news to insurance policyholders who have suffered huge financial loss due to the COVID-19 crisis.

The judgment is complex, running to 112 pages and dealing with many technical legal issues. Some of the main issues are briefly noted below.

A brief summary of the judgment
  • The Supreme Court deviated from the findings of the High Court in respect of identifying the trigger in disease clauses. The Supreme Court found that each case of COVID-19 was a separate occurrence of the disease, and, therefore, such individual occurrence could, as a matter of law, satisfy the test of causation. Accordingly, this concluded that there were no difference between policies which referred to an ‘occurrence’ of a disease, and those which referred to an ‘incident’ or ‘event’.
  • It confirmed that the definition of ‘restrictions imposed’ should be defined widely, and triggered more readily, by removing the requirement that such measures have the force of law.
  • It concluded that for an “inability to use” of use clause of a policy to have effect, there must be a real inability to use a premises rather than simply an impairment or hindrance in use. In highlighting this, the Supreme Court asserted that it would be unlikely that businesses which were not ordered to close would be able to rely on such clauses.
  • Similarly, it found that that a business could rely upon a “prevention of access” clause if it had been unable to use, or was prevented from accessing part of a premises. For example, restaurants that were prevented from operating a dine-in service, and therefore forced to establish a takeaway business, could rely on this clause as there was a prevention of access/inability to use the dining area of the restaurant.
  • The Supreme Court gave a detailed analysis into causation, trend clauses and pre-trigger losses. More specifically:
    • whilst the ‘but for’ test was almost always the correct test for causation, it is neither always necessary nor always sufficient. In this case, it was not necessary;
    • trends clauses should not be taken into account to reduce the level of cover on the basis that the business would have suffered a reduction in turnover due to COVID-19 anyway. The court’s reasoning was that these were losses which were “inextricably linked” to the insured peril; and
    • the Supreme Court disagreed with the High Court’s determination that insurers could account for a downturn on trade due to the effects of COVID-19 prior to the cover being triggered. The court held that insurers could not reduce the amount of a claim due to a downturn in business caused by COVID-19 prior to the insurance policy actually triggering.
  • The Supreme Court’s final notable conclusion was that the landmark Orient Express judgment, involving business insurance claims relating to hurricanes Katrina and Rita, was wrongly decided and should be overruled.
What does this mean for policyholders?

Unfortunately for insurance companies, this judgment has strengthened the position of policyholders significantly beyond that which was already established in the High Court decision. However, it is always worth bearing in mind that insurance cover will always depend on the specific wording of the policy in question.

This is a landmark victory for a small group of businesses, and will offer a lifeline to thousands of bars, restaurants, beauticians, hairdressers and other small businesses whose finances have suffered exponentially due to the COVID-19 pandemic.

This article was co-written by Sarah Milne, Trainee Solicitor.

Latest updates from @MacRoberts

  • Would you like to work at one of Scotland’s leading law firms? We currently have a number of opportunities availabl… https://t.co/atxn5NHzLj 21/06/2021
  • We currently have a vacancy for a Customer Due Diligence Administrator based in Glasgow or Edinburgh. Please shar… https://t.co/IXsvMkBnYa 18/06/2021
  • Maya Forstater received a lot of media attention around her tweets relating to her beliefs about sex, resulting in… https://t.co/VbDAGhzAqX 18/06/2021
  • Applications for our traineeships starting in 2023 are now open! Get your legal career off to the best possible sta… https://t.co/nx3WmygTTM 18/06/2021
  • RT @DundeeAndAngus: Leading Scottish commercial law firm, @MacRoberts has advised BAM on the ‘game-changing’ Atlantic Square development in… 16/06/2021
  • This week on our new IGTV mini-series, giving an insight into what it’s like to begin a legal career during the pan… https://t.co/tqSQy4tRqG 16/06/2021
  • Self-employed status: What does the Uber case really mean? 🚖 Kenny Scott explains what the recent ruling means for… https://t.co/SIt6iBNYPx 16/06/2021
  • What is the Scottish #gin industry doing to improve #sustainability? Following #WorldGinDay celebrations over the w… https://t.co/P4d0oPh54U 15/06/2021
  • The European Commission has adopted & published versions of two new sets of Standard Contractual Clauses. What ch… https://t.co/c8nMQEo6uk 15/06/2021
  • What impact could Ireland High Court's decision to reject an action by Facebook to block an inquiry by the Irish… https://t.co/leiseQnxYe 14/06/2021
  • Wishing all of our followers a happy #WorldGinDay! ICYMI: Earlier this week, we were delighted to catch up with… https://t.co/OJ85qOwAhN 12/06/2021
  • We're #hiring! We have a #vacancy for a Senior #Solicitor or Associate to join our IP, Technology & Commercial team… https://t.co/YWbpcD0eFD 10/06/2021
  • Dealing with an employee's misconduct when that employee contends it is linked to a disability can be tricky - read… https://t.co/Gy1dLbrwPk 09/06/2021
  • MacRoberts' have launched a new IGTV mini-series, giving an insight into what it’s like to begin a legal career dur… https://t.co/yJ5RQRatPn 09/06/2021
  • Scotland's new #landownership transparency register - the Register of Persons Holding a Controlled Interest in Land… https://t.co/PrZ5AwH2Ej 09/06/2021